vandal: be rated ma

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.50
, user
Weight: 0.47
, anyone
Weight: 0.47
, criminal
Weight: 0.44
Siblings thief
Weight: 0.33
, burglar
Weight: 0.32
, rapist
Weight: 0.31
, burning man
Weight: 0.30
, pedophile
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rated ma 1.00
be rated tv ma 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vandal, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(vandal, be rated ma)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vandal, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(vandal, be rated tv ma)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(vandal, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vandal, be rated tv ma)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(vandal, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(vandal, be rated tv ma)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(vandal, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(vandal, be rated tv ma)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(vandal, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(vandal, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vandal, be rated ma)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(vandal, be rated ma)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(vandal, be rated ma)