vega: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents show
Weight: 0.52
, star
Weight: 0.46
, thing
Weight: 0.45
, option
Weight: 0.44
, artist
Weight: 0.44
Siblings stock option
Weight: 0.30
, simpsons
Weight: 0.30
, puerto rican
Weight: 0.30
, sherlock
Weight: 0.30
, bono
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is bad sfv 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sherlock, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sherlock, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(stock option, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sherlock, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(sherlock, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(simpsons, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(simpsons, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sherlock, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sherlock, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(simpsons, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(simpsons, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(stock option, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(vega, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(vega, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(vega, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(vega, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(vega, is bad sfv)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(vega, is bad sfv)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(vega, is bad sfv)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(vega, is bad sfv)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vega, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sherlock, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sherlock, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(stock option, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stock option, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(vega, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality bad)