vegan: be at less risk of heart attack

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents diet
Weight: 0.60
, option
Weight: 0.55
, need
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, many people
Weight: 0.49
Siblings vegetarian
Weight: 0.36
, diet coke
Weight: 0.34
, tofu
Weight: 0.32
, kosher food
Weight: 0.32
, dog food
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at less risk of heart attack 1.00
have heart attacks 0.87
be at risk 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(vegetarian, have heart attacks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(vegetarian, have heart attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(vegetarian, have heart attacks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(vegan, have heart attacks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(vegan, have heart attacks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(vegan, have heart attacks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(vegan, have heart attacks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(vegan, be at risk)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(vegan, be at risk)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(vegan, be at risk)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vegan, be at risk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vegan, be at less risk of heart attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(vegetarian, have heart attacks)