vegetable: be considered better then junk food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.65
, grocery store
Weight: 0.64
, food
Weight: 0.62
, staple
Weight: 0.60
, raw material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tomato sauce
Weight: 0.78
, eggplant
Weight: 0.75
, radish
Weight: 0.74
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.73
, jerusalem artichoke
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered better then junk food 1.00
be considered junk food 0.97
is food 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(staple, is food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(staple, is food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(staple, is food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(staple, is food)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be considered junk food)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(vegetable, be considered junk food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be considered junk food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(vegetable, is food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vegetable, be considered junk food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vegetable, is food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(vegetable, is food)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, is food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(staple, is food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(vegetable, be considered better then junk food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(staple, is food)