vegetation: be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, surface
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tree branch
Weight: 0.68
, poison ivy
Weight: 0.67
, heather
Weight: 0.66
, tree
Weight: 0.62
, grass
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation 1.00
be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation at bottom 0.98
be at top of mountain different from vegetation 0.97
be at top of mountain different from vegetation at bottom 0.95
be at top of tall mountain different 0.92
be at top of tall mountain 0.91
be at top of tall mountain different at bottom 0.90
be at top of tall mountain at bottom 0.89
be at top of mountain different 0.87
be at top of mountain 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at top of mountain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tree, be at top of mountain)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(tree, be at top of mountain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of mountain different from vegetation)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of mountain different from vegetation)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of mountain different from vegetation)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different at bottom)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different at bottom)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain at bottom)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different at bottom)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain at bottom)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain at bottom)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of mountain different)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of mountain different)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(vegetation, be at top of mountain)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of mountain)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of mountain different)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different at bottom)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(vegetation, be at top of mountain)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain at bottom)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of mountain)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of mountain different)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of mountain different from vegetation at bottom)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of mountain different from vegetation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(vegetation, be at top of tall mountain different from vegetation)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tree, be at top of mountain)