ventilation shaft: were built in pyramids

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.54
Siblings stairwell
Weight: 0.32
, abdominal cavity
Weight: 0.32
, basement
Weight: 0.31
, slope
Weight: 0.31
, garage
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
were built in pyramids 1.00
is built 0.76
were built at front 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(basement, is built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(stairwell, is built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(garage, were built at front)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(stairwell, is built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(stairwell, is built)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(garage, were built at front) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(garage, were built at front)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(basement, is built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(basement, is built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(basement, is built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(stairwell, is built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ventilation shaft, were built in pyramids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(garage, were built at front)