vet: be expensive in ontario

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pet owner
Weight: 0.60
, care
Weight: 0.58
, professional
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.56
, expert
Weight: 0.55
Siblings veterinarian
Weight: 0.36
, dentist
Weight: 0.32
, nurse
Weight: 0.32
, trainer
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in ontario 1.00
be expensive in canada 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(vet, be expensive in ontario)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(dentist, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(vet, be expensive in ontario)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(dentist, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(dentist, be expensive in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(vet, be expensive in ontario)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(vet, be expensive in ontario)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(vet, be expensive in ontario)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(vet, be expensive in canada)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(vet, be expensive in ontario)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(vet, be expensive in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(vet, be expensive in ontario)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(vet, be expensive in canada)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(vet, be expensive in ontario)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(vet, be expensive in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(vet, be expensive in ontario)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(vet, be expensive in ontario)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(vet, be expensive in ontario)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(vet, be expensive in ontario)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(vet, be expensive in ontario)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(vet, be expensive in ontario)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(dentist, be expensive in canada)