veterinarian: recommend royal canin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.61
, scientist
Weight: 0.61
Siblings vet
Weight: 0.36
, physician
Weight: 0.35
, biologist
Weight: 0.34
, dentist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
recommend royal canin 1.00
recommend canin 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(vet, recommend royal canin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(vet, recommend canin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(vet, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(vet, recommend royal canin)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(vet, recommend canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(vet, recommend canin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(veterinarian, recommend royal canin)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(veterinarian, recommend canin)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, recommend canin)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(veterinarian, recommend canin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, recommend canin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, recommend royal canin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(veterinarian, recommend royal canin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(vet, recommend royal canin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, recommend royal canin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vet, recommend canin)