vi: was overlooked

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents editor
Weight: 0.54
, application
Weight: 0.51
, text editor
Weight: 0.50
, person
Weight: 0.47
, utility
Weight: 0.47
Siblings emacs
Weight: 0.31
, hvac
Weight: 0.30
, joseph
Weight: 0.30
, napster
Weight: 0.30
, pandora
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
was overlooked 1.00
was completely overlooked 0.91
was overlooked during worlds 0.87
was completely overlooked during worlds 0.83
is underplayed 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(vi, was overlooked)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(vi, was completely overlooked)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(vi, was completely overlooked)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(vi, was completely overlooked)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(vi, is underplayed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(vi, was completely overlooked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(vi, was completely overlooked during worlds)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(vi, was completely overlooked during worlds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(vi, was completely overlooked during worlds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(vi, is underplayed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(vi, was overlooked during worlds)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(vi, was completely overlooked during worlds)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vi, was overlooked during worlds)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(vi, was overlooked during worlds)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(vi, was overlooked during worlds)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(vi, is underplayed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vi, is underplayed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(vi, was overlooked)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(vi, was overlooked)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(vi, was overlooked)