victim: were treated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, suspect
Weight: 0.63
, member
Weight: 0.62
, woman
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neighbor
Weight: 0.70
, wife
Weight: 0.69
, mother
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated 1.00
be treated 0.96
were treated socially 0.85
were treated in world war 1 0.83
were labeled 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(suspect, be treated)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(victim, were treated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(suspect, be treated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(suspect, be treated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(suspect, be treated)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(victim, were treated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(victim, were treated)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(victim, be treated)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(victim, be treated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(victim, be treated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(victim, be treated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(victim, were treated in world war 1)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(victim, were treated socially)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(victim, were labeled)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(victim, were labeled)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(victim, were labeled)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(victim, were labeled)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(victim, were treated socially)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(victim, were treated socially)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(victim, were treated socially)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(victim, were treated in world war 1)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(victim, were treated in world war 1)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(victim, were treated in world war 1)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(victim, were treated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(victim, were treated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(suspect, be treated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(suspect, be treated)