video: be darker than photo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents demo
Weight: 0.65
, electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, digital camera
Weight: 0.62
, demonstration
Weight: 0.62
Siblings television show
Weight: 0.68
, television series
Weight: 0.62
, minute
Weight: 0.61
, webcam
Weight: 0.58
, tube
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be darker than photo 1.00
be darker than pictures 0.94
be darker than photo iphone 0.93
be photos 0.82
take pictures 0.80
has state pictures 0.78
be photos colorized 0.78
require less light than stills 0.78
be pictures colorized 0.77
store images in camera 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(digital camera, take pictures)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(video, be darker than photo)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(video, be darker than photo)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(digital camera, take pictures)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, take pictures)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, store images in camera)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(digital camera, take pictures)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(video, be darker than photo)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(video, be darker than photo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(video, be darker than photo)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(video, be darker than pictures)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(video, be darker than pictures)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(video, be darker than pictures)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(video, be darker than pictures)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(video, be darker than photo iphone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(video, be darker than photo iphone)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(video, be darker than photo iphone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(video, be darker than photo iphone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(video, be darker than photo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(video, be darker than photo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(digital camera, take pictures)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, store images in camera)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(digital camera, take pictures)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(video, be darker than photo)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, store images in camera)