video: is player

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents demo
Weight: 0.65
, electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, digital camera
Weight: 0.62
, demonstration
Weight: 0.62
Siblings television show
Weight: 0.68
, television series
Weight: 0.62
, minute
Weight: 0.61
, webcam
Weight: 0.58
, tube
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
is player 1.00
is game 0.77
playing games 0.76
be added to soccer game 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(minute, be added to soccer game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(minute, be added to soccer game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(minute, be added to soccer game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(video, is player)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(video, playing games)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(video, is game)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(video, playing games)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(video, is game)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(video, playing games)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(video, is game)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(video, is game)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(video, playing games)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(video, is player)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(video, is player)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(video, is player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(minute, be added to soccer game)