viking: be good year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.54
, brand
Weight: 0.54
, tv show
Weight: 0.50
, company
Weight: 0.49
, team
Weight: 0.49
Siblings smallville
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.32
, simpsons
Weight: 0.31
, gnome
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good year 1.00
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(viking, be good year)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smallville, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(viking, be good year)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(smallville, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(smallville, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(simpsons, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(simpsons, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sherlock holmes, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(viking, be good year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(viking, be good year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(viking, be good year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(smallville, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(viking, be good year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)