virologist: consider nonliving

Related concepts

Parents	scientist Weight: 0.47 , specialist Weight: 0.46 , virus Weight: 0.32
Siblings	geneticist Weight: 0.34 , physicist Weight: 0.33 , biologist Weight: 0.32 , astronomer Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
consider nonliving	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(virologist, consider nonliving) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(biologist, consider nonliving)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(virologist, consider nonliving) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(biologist, consider nonliving) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(biologist, consider nonliving)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(virologist, consider nonliving) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(virologist, consider nonliving)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(virologist, consider nonliving) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(virologist, consider nonliving) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(virologist, consider nonliving)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(virologist, consider nonliving) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(virologist, consider nonliving)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(virologist, consider nonliving) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(biologist, consider nonliving)