virologist: consider viruses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.47
, specialist
Weight: 0.46
, virus
Weight: 0.32
Siblings geneticist
Weight: 0.34
, physicist
Weight: 0.33
, biologist
Weight: 0.32
, astronomer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
consider viruses 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(virologist, consider viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(biologist, consider viruses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(virologist, consider viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(biologist, consider viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(biologist, consider viruses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(virologist, consider viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(virologist, consider viruses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(virologist, consider viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(virologist, consider viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(virologist, consider viruses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(virologist, consider viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(virologist, consider viruses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(virologist, consider viruses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(biologist, consider viruses)