visa card: be at mail

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents card
Weight: 0.68
, prize
Weight: 0.55
, credit
Weight: 0.53
, service
Weight: 0.49
, account
Weight: 0.45
Siblings credit card
Weight: 0.71
, wild card
Weight: 0.38
, debit card
Weight: 0.37
, business card
Weight: 0.37
, index card
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at mail 1.00
be send through mail 0.90
be at mailbox 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(card, be send through mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(visa card, be at mail)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(card, be at mailbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(visa card, be at mail)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(card, be at mailbox)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(card, be send through mail)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(card, be at mailbox)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(card, be send through mail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(card, be send through mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(visa card, be at mail)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(card, be at mailbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(visa card, be at mail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(visa card, be at mail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(visa card, be at mail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(visa card, be at mail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(card, be send through mail)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(card, be at mailbox)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(card, be send through mail)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(visa card, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(card, be at mailbox)