vision: be better at night

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, example
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.60
, technology
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ambition
Weight: 0.35
, passion
Weight: 0.35
, dedication
Weight: 0.34
, commitment
Weight: 0.34
, creativity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better at night 1.00
get at night 0.92
be worse at night 0.92
be worse in morning 0.84
be in morning 0.79
get better with age 0.77
get worse 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(vision, be better at night)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(vision, be worse at night)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(vision, be worse at night)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(vision, be worse at night)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vision, get at night)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(vision, get at night)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(vision, get at night)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vision, be worse in morning)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(vision, be worse in morning)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(vision, be worse in morning)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(vision, be worse at night)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(vision, get worse)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(vision, get worse)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(vision, get better with age)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(vision, get worse)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(vision, get better with age)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(vision, get better with age)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vision, be in morning)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vision, get at night)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(vision, be worse in morning)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(vision, be in morning)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(vision, be in morning)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(vision, get worse)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(vision, get better with age)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(vision, be in morning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vision, be better at night)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(vision, be better at night)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(vision, be better at night)