vision: be better than sight

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, example
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.60
, technology
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ambition
Weight: 0.35
, passion
Weight: 0.35
, dedication
Weight: 0.34
, commitment
Weight: 0.34
, creativity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than sight 1.00
be in better one eye 0.82
be worse in one eye 0.81
be with better two eyes 0.79
see better in dark 0.77
get in one eye 0.76
be darker in one eye 0.76
be blurry in one eye 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(vision, be better than sight)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(vision, be worse in one eye)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(vision, be worse in one eye)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vision, be worse in one eye)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(vision, be in better one eye)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(vision, be in better one eye)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(vision, be in better one eye)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(vision, get in one eye)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(vision, be worse in one eye)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(vision, be in better one eye)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(vision, get in one eye)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(vision, get in one eye)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(vision, see better in dark)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(vision, be darker in one eye)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(vision, see better in dark)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(vision, be blurry in one eye)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(vision, be blurry in one eye)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(vision, be darker in one eye)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(vision, get in one eye)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(vision, be blurry in one eye)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(vision, see better in dark)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(vision, be darker in one eye)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(vision, be blurry in one eye)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(vision, see better in dark)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(vision, be darker in one eye)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(vision, be better than sight)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vision, be better than sight)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(vision, be better than sight)