vision: be important to primates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, example
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.60
, technology
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ambition
Weight: 0.35
, passion
Weight: 0.35
, dedication
Weight: 0.34
, commitment
Weight: 0.34
, creativity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to primates 1.00
be adaptive for primates 0.91
be important to humans 0.81
be in humans 0.79
be in animals 0.79
be in humans different 0.77
be in humans different from vision in animals 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(vision, be important to primates)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(vision, be adaptive for primates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(vision, be adaptive for primates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(vision, be adaptive for primates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(vision, be adaptive for primates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(vision, be in humans different from vision in animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(vision, be in humans different from vision in animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(vision, be important to humans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(vision, be in humans different from vision in animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(vision, be in humans different from vision in animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(vision, be important to humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(vision, be important to humans)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important to humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important to primates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(vision, be important to primates)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(vision, be important to primates)