vision: is sense

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, example
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.60
, technology
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ambition
Weight: 0.35
, passion
Weight: 0.35
, dedication
Weight: 0.34
, commitment
Weight: 0.34
, creativity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is sense 1.00
is important sense 0.96
is most important sense 0.91
be last sense develop 0.86
be most important sense in driving 0.83
is most dominant sense 0.81
be considered dominant sense 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(vision, is sense)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(vision, is important sense)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(vision, is most important sense)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(vision, is important sense)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(vision, be most important sense in driving)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(vision, be most important sense in driving)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(vision, is most important sense)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(vision, is important sense)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(vision, be most important sense in driving)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(vision, is important sense)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(vision, is most important sense)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(vision, is most important sense)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(vision, be most important sense in driving)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vision, is sense)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(vision, is sense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(vision, is sense)