visit: india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meeting
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.61
, mission
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hospital visit
Weight: 0.37
, tour
Weight: 0.33
, escort service
Weight: 0.33
, encounter
Weight: 0.32
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
india 1.00
be in india 0.99
is uk 0.81
be in germany 0.80
be in singapore 0.80
be bad in singapore 0.79
be bad in uk 0.79
be bad in europe 0.78
is france 0.78
is exe high cpu 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(service, is exe high cpu)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(visit, india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(meeting, be in singapore)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(visit, india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, be bad in singapore)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(visit, india)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(service, be bad in europe)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(visit, india)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(service, be bad in uk)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(visit, india)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(event, be in germany)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(visit, india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(event, be in germany)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in uk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in europe)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(meeting, be in singapore)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in singapore)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(service, is exe high cpu)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(event, be in germany)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in uk)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in europe)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in singapore)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(meeting, be in singapore)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(service, is exe high cpu)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tour, is france)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tour, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(service, is exe high cpu)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(visit, india)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(meeting, be in singapore)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(visit, india)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, be bad in singapore)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(visit, india)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(service, be bad in europe)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(visit, india)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(service, be bad in uk)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(visit, india)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(event, be in germany)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(visit, india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tour, is uk)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(tour, is uk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tour, is france)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tour, is france)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(visit, india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(visit, india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, be bad in uk)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(event, be in germany)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be bad in europe)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(meeting, be in singapore)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(service, be bad in singapore)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(service, is exe high cpu)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tour, is uk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tour, is france)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(event, be in germany)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, be bad in uk)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(meeting, be in singapore)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(service, be bad in singapore)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be bad in europe)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(visit, india)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(service, is exe high cpu)