visit: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meeting
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.61
, mission
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hospital visit
Weight: 0.37
, tour
Weight: 0.33
, escort service
Weight: 0.33
, encounter
Weight: 0.32
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be more expensive for less 0.86
be more expensive for less now 0.85
be cheaper in countries 0.78
be cheaper in poor countries 0.77
need cost 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be cheaper in poor countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(visit, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(service, be cheaper in poor countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(service, be cheaper in poor countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wedding reception, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tour, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hospital visit, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(encounter, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be cheaper in poor countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(visit, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(encounter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(encounter, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hospital visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hospital visit, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(tour, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tour, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(wedding reception, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(wedding reception, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(visit, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(visit, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(visit, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be cheaper in poor countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(encounter, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wedding reception, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tour, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hospital visit, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(visit, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be cheaper in poor countries)