visitor: is terrible drivers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
, event
Weight: 0.59
, duty
Weight: 0.57
, student
Weight: 0.57
, university
Weight: 0.56
Siblings spectator
Weight: 0.56
, local
Weight: 0.51
, one person
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is terrible drivers 1.00
is drivers 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(visitor, is terrible drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(visitor, is terrible drivers)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(visitor, is terrible drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(visitor, is drivers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(visitor, is terrible drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(visitor, is drivers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(visitor, is terrible drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(visitor, is drivers)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(visitor, is terrible drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(visitor, is drivers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(visitor, is terrible drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(visitor, is terrible drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(visitor, is terrible drivers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(visitor, is terrible drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(visitor, is terrible drivers)