voice: be used to communicate

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loud noise
Weight: 0.65
, channel
Weight: 0.64
, platform
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
Siblings microphone
Weight: 0.63
, dialect
Weight: 0.51
, loud music
Weight: 0.36
, tone
Weight: 0.33
, scream
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to communicate 1.00
be used to communication 0.81
be used to speak 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(platform, be used to speak)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(voice, be used to communicate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(voice, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(platform, be used to speak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(voice, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(platform, be used to speak)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(platform, be used to speak)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(voice, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(voice, be used to communicate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(voice, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(voice, be used to communicate)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(voice, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(voice, be used to communication)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(voice, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(voice, be used to communication)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(voice, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(voice, be used to communication)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(voice, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(voice, be used to communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(voice, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(voice, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(voice, be used to communicate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(voice, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(voice, be used to communicate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(voice, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(platform, be used to speak)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(voice, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(platform, be used to speak)