volunteer: be at hospital good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.63
, community
Weight: 0.61
, experience
Weight: 0.61
Siblings joe
Weight: 0.59
, local
Weight: 0.51
, ems
Weight: 0.46
, homeless person
Weight: 0.35
, elderly person
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hospital good 1.00
be at hospital 0.97
be at hospital good for patients 0.93
be at hospital for patients 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(person, be at hospital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(volunteer, be at hospital good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(person, be at hospital)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(person, be at hospital)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(person, be at hospital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(volunteer, be at hospital good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(volunteer, be at hospital good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(volunteer, be at hospital)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(volunteer, be at hospital)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(volunteer, be at hospital for patients)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(volunteer, be at hospital)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(volunteer, be at hospital for patients)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(volunteer, be at hospital for patients)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(volunteer, be at hospital good for patients)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(volunteer, be at hospital good for patients)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(volunteer, be at hospital good for patients)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(volunteer, be at hospital for patients)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(volunteer, be at hospital)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(volunteer, be at hospital good for patients)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(volunteer, be at hospital good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(volunteer, be at hospital good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(person, be at hospital)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(volunteer, be at hospital good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(person, be at hospital)