vote: be needed win

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.67
, majority
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.69
, ballot
Weight: 0.54
, dissent
Weight: 0.50
, turnout
Weight: 0.43
, amendment
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed win 1.00
is needed 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(amendment, is needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(vote, be needed win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(amendment, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(amendment, is needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(vote, be needed win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(vote, be needed win)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(vote, be needed win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(vote, be needed win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed win)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(vote, be needed win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(vote, be needed win)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amendment, is needed)