vote: has state health

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.67
, majority
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.69
, ballot
Weight: 0.54
, dissent
Weight: 0.50
, turnout
Weight: 0.43
, amendment
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state health 1.00
has state security 0.79
has state first 0.77
has state problem 0.76
has state end 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(event, has state security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vote, has state health)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(event, has state end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vote, has state health)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(event, has state security)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(event, has state end)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(event, has state security)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(event, has state end)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has state first)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(turnout, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(event, has state security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(vote, has state health)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(event, has state end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(vote, has state health)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(turnout, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(turnout, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(amendment, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(amendment, has state first)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(vote, has state health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vote, has state health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vote, has state health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(event, has state security)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(event, has state end)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(turnout, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(amendment, has state first)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(event, has state security)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(vote, has state health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(event, has state end)