vote: is are tallied

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.67
, majority
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.69
, ballot
Weight: 0.54
, dissent
Weight: 0.50
, turnout
Weight: 0.43
, amendment
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is are tallied 1.00
is counted 0.78
be counted 0.77
be counted in state 0.76
were counted in election 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ballot, were counted in election)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(ballot, were counted in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ballot, were counted in election)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(vote, is are tallied)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(vote, is counted)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(vote, be counted)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(vote, is counted)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(vote, be counted)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vote, be counted in state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(vote, is counted)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(vote, be counted)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(vote, be counted)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vote, is counted)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(vote, be counted in state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(vote, be counted in state)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(vote, be counted in state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vote, is are tallied)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(vote, is are tallied)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(vote, is are tallied) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ballot, were counted in election)