vote: is bad idea

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.67
, majority
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.69
, ballot
Weight: 0.54
, dissent
Weight: 0.50
, turnout
Weight: 0.43
, amendment
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad idea 1.00
is idea 0.94
CAN can good idea 0.85
is good thing 0.83
CAN can idea 0.82
is thing 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(event, CAN can good idea)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(vote, is bad idea)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(event, CAN can good idea)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(event, CAN can good idea)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(turnout, is good thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(turnout, is thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(event, CAN can good idea)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(vote, is bad idea)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(turnout, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(turnout, is good thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(turnout, is thing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(turnout, is thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(vote, is bad idea)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(vote, is idea)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(vote, is idea)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(vote, is idea)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vote, is idea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, is bad idea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(vote, is bad idea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(event, CAN can good idea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(turnout, is thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(turnout, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(vote, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(event, CAN can good idea)