vote: limit contribution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.67
, majority
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.69
, ballot
Weight: 0.54
, dissent
Weight: 0.50
, turnout
Weight: 0.43
, amendment
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
limit contribution 1.00
have limits 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(vote, limit contribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(amendment, have limits)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(vote, limit contribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(amendment, have limits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(amendment, have limits)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(vote, limit contribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(vote, limit contribution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(vote, limit contribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(vote, limit contribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(vote, limit contribution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(vote, limit contribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(vote, limit contribution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(vote, limit contribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(amendment, have limits)