vote: no in ca

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.67
, majority
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.69
, ballot
Weight: 0.54
, dissent
Weight: 0.50
, turnout
Weight: 0.43
, amendment
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
no in ca 1.00
be in uk 0.77
is uk 0.76
work in uk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(general election, be in uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(turnout, is uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ballot, is uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(general election, work in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(turnout, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(turnout, is uk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ballot, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(ballot, is uk)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(general election, work in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(general election, work in uk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(general election, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(general election, be in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(vote, no in ca)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vote, no in ca)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(vote, no in ca)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(turnout, is uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ballot, is uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(general election, be in uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vote, no in ca) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(general election, work in uk)