voter: be i d requirements bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, source
Weight: 0.56
, turnout
Weight: 0.56
, other people
Weight: 0.55
, step
Weight: 0.54
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.33
, candidate
Weight: 0.33
, other person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be i d requirements bad 1.00
be i d requirements 0.99
be i d requirements racist 0.95
is i d bad 0.93
is i d good 0.92
is i d laws bad 0.92
is i d laws good 0.92
is i d 0.92
is i d problem 0.91
be i d laws 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(voter, be i d requirements bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(voter, is i d)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(voter, be i d requirements racist)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(voter, be i d requirements racist)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(voter, is i d problem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(voter, is i d bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(voter, is i d)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(voter, is i d problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(voter, be i d requirements racist)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d laws bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(voter, is i d good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(voter, is i d laws bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(voter, is i d good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(voter, be i d requirements racist)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(voter, is i d bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d laws bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(voter, is i d laws good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(voter, is i d laws bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(voter, is i d laws good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(voter, is i d laws good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(voter, is i d laws good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(voter, be i d requirements bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(voter, be i d requirements bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(voter, be i d requirements bad)