voter: be voted in 2016

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, source
Weight: 0.56
, turnout
Weight: 0.56
, other people
Weight: 0.55
, step
Weight: 0.54
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.33
, candidate
Weight: 0.33
, other person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be voted in 2016 1.00
be voted for trump 0.90
vote 0.83
is vote 0.83
is actually vote 0.80
be required vote 0.79
is where vote 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(voter, be voted in 2016)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(voter, be voted for trump)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(voter, be voted for trump)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(voter, be voted for trump)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(voter, vote)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(voter, is vote)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(voter, vote)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(voter, is vote)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(voter, vote)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(voter, is vote)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(voter, be required vote)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(voter, be required vote)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(voter, be required vote)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(voter, be required vote)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(voter, be voted for trump)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(voter, is vote)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(voter, vote)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(voter, be voted in 2016)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(voter, be voted in 2016)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(voter, be voted in 2016)