voter: consider candidate

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, matter
Weight: 0.52
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, other person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
consider candidate 1.00
choose candidate 0.92
back their candidate 0.89
supply politician with vote 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(voter, consider candidate)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(voter, back their candidate)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(voter, back their candidate)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(voter, choose candidate)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(voter, choose candidate)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(voter, back their candidate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(voter, choose candidate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(voter, choose candidate)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(voter, supply politician with vote)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(voter, supply politician with vote)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(voter, supply politician with vote)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(voter, supply politician with vote)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(voter, back their candidate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(voter, consider candidate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(voter, consider candidate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(voter, consider candidate)