voter: is new mexico

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, source
Weight: 0.56
, turnout
Weight: 0.56
, other people
Weight: 0.55
, step
Weight: 0.54
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.33
, candidate
Weight: 0.33
, other person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is new mexico 1.00
is california 0.79
is new york 0.79
is michigan 0.78
is ohio 0.77
is wisconsin 0.77
is maryland 0.76
is houston 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(voter, is new mexico)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(voter, is new york)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(voter, is california)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(voter, is new york)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(voter, is california)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(voter, is michigan)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(voter, is michigan)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(voter, is new york)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(voter, is wisconsin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(voter, is ohio)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(voter, is wisconsin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(voter, is ohio)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(voter, is california)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(voter, is maryland)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(voter, is houston)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(voter, is maryland)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(voter, is michigan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(voter, is houston)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(voter, is wisconsin)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(voter, is ohio)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(voter, is houston)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(voter, is maryland)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(voter, is new york)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(voter, is houston)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(voter, is wisconsin)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(voter, is california)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(voter, is maryland)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(voter, is ohio)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(voter, is michigan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(voter, is new mexico)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(voter, is new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(voter, is new mexico)