voter: support hillary clinton

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, source
Weight: 0.56
, turnout
Weight: 0.56
, other people
Weight: 0.55
, step
Weight: 0.54
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.33
, candidate
Weight: 0.33
, other person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
support hillary clinton 1.00
hate much hillary 0.90
choose hillary 0.89
turn against hillary 0.88
is michigan 0.77
is maryland 0.76
is wisconsin 0.76
support republican 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(voter, support hillary clinton)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(voter, turn against hillary)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(voter, turn against hillary)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(voter, choose hillary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(voter, turn against hillary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(voter, turn against hillary)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(voter, is wisconsin)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(voter, choose hillary)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(voter, is michigan)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(voter, is maryland)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(voter, support republican)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(voter, is wisconsin)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(voter, choose hillary)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(voter, is wisconsin)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(voter, is maryland)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(voter, support republican)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(voter, is wisconsin)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(voter, is maryland)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(voter, support republican)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(voter, choose hillary)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(voter, is michigan)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(voter, is michigan)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(voter, support republican)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(voter, is maryland)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(voter, is michigan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(voter, support hillary clinton)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(voter, support hillary clinton)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(voter, support hillary clinton)