waiter: ask taste

Property	Similarity
ask taste	1.00
ask try	0.82
pour wine to taste	0.79

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(waiter, ask taste) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(waiter, ask try)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(waiter, ask taste) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(waiter, pour wine to taste)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(waiter, ask taste) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(waiter, ask try)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(waiter, ask taste) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(waiter, pour wine to taste)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(waiter, ask taste) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(waiter, ask try)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.45

Typical(waiter, ask taste) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(waiter, ask try)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(waiter, ask taste) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(waiter, pour wine to taste)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.45

Typical(waiter, ask taste) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(waiter, pour wine to taste)

Parents	employee Weight: 0.69 , man Weight: 0.64 , worker Weight: 0.63 , job Weight: 0.62 , restaurant Weight: 0.59
Siblings	bartender Weight: 0.36 , italian restaurant Weight: 0.36 , receptionist Weight: 0.35 , policeman Weight: 0.35 , seafood restaurant Weight: 0.35

waiter: ask taste

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible