waiter: wear ties

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.69
, man
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
, job
Weight: 0.62
, restaurant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bartender
Weight: 0.36
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, receptionist
Weight: 0.35
, policeman
Weight: 0.35
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear ties 1.00
wear bow ties 0.94
wear black 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear black)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bartender, wear black)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bartender, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bartender, wear black)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(policeman, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear black)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(waiter, wear ties)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear bow ties)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear black)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear black)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(waiter, wear bow ties)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear bow ties)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear ties)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(waiter, wear ties)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bartender, wear black)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear ties) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(policeman, wear black)