waitress: change in office

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.66
, server
Weight: 0.55
, food
Weight: 0.54
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.36
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.36
, grandmother
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
change in office 1.00
keep change 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(waitress, change in office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(waitress, change in office)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(waitress, change in office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(waitress, keep change)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(waitress, change in office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(waitress, keep change)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(waitress, change in office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(waitress, keep change)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(waitress, change in office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(waitress, keep change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(waitress, change in office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(waitress, change in office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(waitress, change in office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(waitress, change in office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(waitress, change in office)