waitress: expect tips

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.66
, server
Weight: 0.55
, food
Weight: 0.54
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.36
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.36
, grandmother
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
expect tips 1.00
get tips 0.93
complain about tips 0.91
get tip 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(server, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(waitress, expect tips)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(server, get tips)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(server, get tips)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(server, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(waitress, expect tips)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(waitress, expect tips)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(waitress, get tips)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(waitress, complain about tips)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(waitress, complain about tips)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(waitress, complain about tips)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(waitress, get tips)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(waitress, expect tips)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(waitress, expect tips)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(server, get tips)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(waitress, expect tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(server, get tips)