waitress: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.66
, server
Weight: 0.55
, food
Weight: 0.54
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.36
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.36
, grandmother
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid 0.96
get paid little 0.93
is paid little 0.90
have get 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(waitress, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(waitress, is paid)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(waitress, get paid little)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(waitress, get paid little)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(waitress, get paid little)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(waitress, is paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(waitress, is paid little)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(waitress, is paid little)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(waitress, have get)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(waitress, is paid little)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(waitress, is paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(waitress, is paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(waitress, have get)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(waitress, get paid little)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(waitress, have get)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waitress, is paid little)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(waitress, have get)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(waitress, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(waitress, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(waitress, get paid)