waitress: use math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.66
, server
Weight: 0.55
, food
Weight: 0.54
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.36
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.36
, grandmother
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
use math 1.00
use maths 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(waitress, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(waitress, use math)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(waitress, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(waitress, use maths)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(waitress, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(waitress, use maths)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(waitress, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(waitress, use maths)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(waitress, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(waitress, use maths)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(waitress, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(waitress, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(waitress, use math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(waitress, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(waitress, use math)