wale: be in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.58
, rapper
Weight: 0.55
, country
Weight: 0.53
, place
Weight: 0.49
, guest
Weight: 0.46
Siblings abba
Weight: 0.33
, sylvia plath
Weight: 0.33
, louis armstrong
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in uk 1.00
be in uk called 0.98
be region of uk 0.92
be woefully under-represented in uk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(wale, be in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(wale, be in uk called)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(wale, be region of uk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(wale, be in uk called)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wale, be region of uk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(wale, be region of uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(wale, be region of uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(wale, be woefully under-represented in uk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(wale, be in uk called)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wale, be in uk called)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wale, be woefully under-represented in uk)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(wale, be woefully under-represented in uk)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wale, be woefully under-represented in uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wale, be in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wale, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wale, be in uk)