walk: be allowed in glasgow

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.58
, home run
Weight: 0.57
, sight
Weight: 0.57
, hit
Weight: 0.56
Siblings next
Weight: 0.52
, march
Weight: 0.33
, go
Weight: 0.33
, ride
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be allowed in glasgow 1.00
be allowed in scotland 0.84
is allowed 0.81
be at disneyland 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ride, be at disneyland)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(march, is allowed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(march, is allowed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(march, is allowed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(ride, be at disneyland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ride, be at disneyland)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(walk, be allowed in glasgow)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(walk, is allowed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(walk, is allowed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(walk, is allowed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(walk, be allowed in scotland)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(walk, be allowed in scotland)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(walk, be allowed in scotland)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(walk, be allowed in scotland)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(walk, is allowed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(walk, be allowed in glasgow)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(walk, be allowed in glasgow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(march, is allowed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(walk, be allowed in glasgow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ride, be at disneyland)