wall: have thin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents window
Weight: 0.65
, barrier
Weight: 0.64
, sculpture
Weight: 0.64
, line
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cell wall
Weight: 0.68
, corner
Weight: 0.65
, glass
Weight: 0.64
, main entrance
Weight: 0.59
, ceiling
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thin 1.00
is thin 0.99
need thin 0.97
have extremely thin vessels 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, is thin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cell wall, is thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cell wall, is thin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(wall, have thin)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(wall, is thin)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(wall, is thin)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(wall, is thin)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(wall, have extremely thin vessels)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wall, is thin)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(wall, have extremely thin vessels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wall, have extremely thin vessels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wall, have extremely thin vessels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(wall, have thin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wall, have thin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(wall, have thin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cell wall, is thin)