wallpaper: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artwork
Weight: 0.65
, picture
Weight: 0.61
, product
Weight: 0.60
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.60
Siblings collage
Weight: 0.34
, picture frame
Weight: 0.33
, tapestry
Weight: 0.33
, carpeting
Weight: 0.33
, flooring
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality use 0.88
is high quality 0.86
has quality worth 0.85
has quality cost 0.82
is higher quality 0.80
has quality availability 0.78
look good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wallpaper, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wallpaper, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, has quality use)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality use)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(picture frame, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(collage, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(picture frame, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wallpaper, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wallpaper, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(collage, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(collage, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(picture frame, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(picture frame, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(picture frame, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(picture frame, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(wallpaper, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wallpaper, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wallpaper, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality use)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(collage, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(picture frame, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(picture frame, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wallpaper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality use)