walnut: taste rancid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.66
, wood
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.61
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, walnut tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste rancid 1.00
taste bad 0.86
taste bitter 0.84
taste good 0.84
taste funny 0.80
smell bad 0.80
taste like soap 0.78
taste like paint 0.77
smell 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, smell bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pear tree, smell bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pear tree, smell bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(walnut, taste rancid)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(walnut, taste bitter)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(walnut, taste bitter)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(walnut, taste bitter)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, smell bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(walnut, smell bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(walnut, taste like paint)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(walnut, taste like paint)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(walnut, taste like paint)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(walnut, smell bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(walnut, taste bitter)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(walnut, taste like paint)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(walnut, smell bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(walnut, taste like soap)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(walnut, taste funny)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(walnut, taste like soap)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(walnut, taste like soap)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(walnut, taste like soap)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(walnut, taste funny)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(walnut, taste funny)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(walnut, taste funny)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(walnut, taste rancid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(walnut, taste rancid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(walnut, taste rancid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pear tree, smell bad)