walrus: is mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.61
, wild animal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings whale
Weight: 0.37
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.37
, sea otter
Weight: 0.36
, moose
Weight: 0.36
, blue whale
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is mammals 1.00
is mammal 0.90
be called amphibians 0.82
be called true amphibians 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(walrus, is mammals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mammal, is mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.00
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(mammal, is mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, is mammals)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, is mammals)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, is mammal)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, is mammal)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, is mammals)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, is mammal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(walrus, is mammals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(sea otter, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(sea otter, is mammals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(humpback whale, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(humpback whale, is mammals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(whale, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(whale, is mammals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(sea otter, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sea otter, is mammal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(blue whale, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(blue whale, is mammal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(whale, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(whale, is mammal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(walrus, is mammals)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(walrus, is mammal)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(walrus, is mammal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(walrus, be called true amphibians)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(walrus, is mammal)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(walrus, be called true amphibians)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(walrus, be called true amphibians)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(walrus, be called true amphibians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(walrus, is mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mammal, is mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(sea otter, is mammals)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(humpback whale, is mammals)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(whale, is mammals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(sea otter, is mammal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(blue whale, is mammal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(whale, is mammal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(walrus, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mammal, is mammals)