walrus: survive in arctic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.61
, wild animal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings whale
Weight: 0.37
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.37
, sea otter
Weight: 0.36
, moose
Weight: 0.36
, blue whale
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
survive in arctic 1.00
live in arctic 0.93
survive 0.80
adapt to polar region 0.80
adapt to extreme cold 0.78
adapt to cold 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(walrus, survive in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(moose, survive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(walrus, survive in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(moose, survive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(moose, survive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(walrus, survive in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(walrus, survive in arctic)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(walrus, survive in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(walrus, live in arctic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(walrus, survive in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(walrus, live in arctic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(walrus, survive in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(walrus, adapt to polar region)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(walrus, survive in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(walrus, live in arctic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(walrus, survive in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(walrus, live in arctic)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(walrus, survive in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(walrus, survive in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(walrus, survive in arctic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(walrus, survive in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(walrus, survive in arctic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(walrus, survive in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(moose, survive)