want: affect natural resources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, need
Weight: 0.59
, word
Weight: 0.59
, life
Weight: 0.50
, world
Weight: 0.49
Siblings do
Weight: 0.36
, try
Weight: 0.35
, wish
Weight: 0.35
, living thing
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect natural resources 1.00
affect resources 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(need, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(want, affect natural resources)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(want, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(need, affect natural resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(want, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(need, affect natural resources)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(need, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(want, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(want, affect natural resources)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(want, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(want, affect natural resources)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(want, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(want, affect resources)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(want, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(want, affect resources)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(want, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(want, affect resources)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(want, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(want, affect resources)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(want, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(want, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(want, affect natural resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(want, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(want, affect natural resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(want, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(need, affect natural resources)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(want, affect natural resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(need, affect natural resources)